Login for members – logging in gives you access to the ReOpT tool and enhanced directory searching for public sector users.
Don't have a log-in?
Register Now
Forgotten your password?
Click here for a reminder
This 2008 report considers the fiscal and policy measures that might be considered to promote Remanufacturing and Reuse. It draws heavily from OECD research and analysis in the area of development and evaluation of policy instruments.
In this report, we try to answer two key questions:
The paper is divided into three parts:
Current policies, particularly the implementation of EPR, are favouring recycling rather than other alternative used goods processing routes. This could be considered a policy failure which needs to be corrected.
We have identified a number of areas where policy intervention could take place:
In terms of ensuring that an integrated policy is developed which is ‘blind’ to the various different disposal routes but reflects overall policy objectives, we concluded that carbon criteria would be useful as focus would then be on incentivising the most effective disposal route in terms of minimisation of CO2 emissions while simultaneously supporting the UK Government’s current international climate change commitments. We also need to be aware that the established recycling infrastructures and industry already in place may present an obstacle to increased remanufacturing activity.
Economic instruments could potentially be utilised, providing they were based on robust evidence of products/product groups where remanufacturing offered carbon benefits over and above alternative disposal options including recycling. At this point in time, work has barely started on the development of such an evidence base.
Credit: Original work of Oakdene Hollins Ltd.